IndiaWorldWeb Stories
Sports | Cricket
AutoEntertainment
More | TechHealthTrendingVideoLifestyleSponsoredReligionOpinionBharat ek sochTop NewsBusiness

Samajwadi Party MP Suggests Replacing Sengol With Constitution, BJP Responds Sharply

Samajwadi Party MP RK Chaudhary sparked controversy by demanding that the historic Sengol sceptre in the Lok Sabha be replaced with the Constitution
12:54 PM Jun 27, 2024 IST | Aniket Raj
Sengol in Lok Sabha
Advertisement

Samajwadi Party MP RK Chaudhary caused controversy by calling for the historic sceptre, the Sengol, to be replaced with the Constitution in the Lok Sabha. This demand led to strong criticism from the BJP and other NDA allies.

Advertisement

In a letter to pro-tem Speaker Bhartruhari Mahtab, RK Chaudhary described the Sengol as an "anachronistic symbol of monarchy" in a democratic India. Explaining his reasoning, Chaudhary stated, "Sengol means 'Raj Dand'. It also means 'Raja ka Danda'. After ending the princely order, the country became independent. Will the country be run by 'Raja ka danda' or the Constitution? I demand that Sengol be removed from Parliament to save the Constitution."

The Sengol, placed in the Lok Sabha during the inauguration of the new Parliament building last year, was initially presented to India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, as a symbol of the transfer of power from the British to the Indian people.

Advertisement

Chaudhary's remarks drew heavy criticism from the BJP, with the party accusing the Samajwadi Party of being "hell-bent" on insulting an integral part of Indian and Tamil culture.

Also Read: Train Berth Falls On Kerala Man, Leading To Death; Railways Clarify No Seat Defect

Advertisement

BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla questioned, "If it was a symbol of monarchy, then why did the first Prime Minister Nehru accept it? Was he accepting that symbol and monarchy?"

LJP (Ram Vilas) MP Chirag Paswan also responded, asserting that Congress and Congress-led governments have always tried to misrepresent historical symbols. "These people cannot do positive politics... They only engage in politics of division," he said.

Amid the controversy, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav explained that Chaudhary was highlighting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi did not bow before the Sengol after taking his oath in the Lok Sabha. He suggested that the PM, having bowed before the Sengol during its installation, might have forgotten to do so when taking the oath.

RJD MP Manoj Jha also defended the Samajwadi Party, criticizing the PM's conduct and suggesting that a replica of the Constitution would be more appropriate to symbolize the governance of the country.

Also Read: After Gujarat And Bihar, Odisha Minister Advocates For Liquor Ban In The State

Advertisement
Tags :
Lok SabhaSengol
Advertisement
Advertisement